What is the safest distance from the 5G cell Tower?
If you've ever walked through a city, you may have seen tiny cell towers for 5G placed on poles for street lighting. They appear like tiny boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.
https://click4r.com/posts/g/9267087/ are replacing the larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're less noticeable, they still can cause problems for people.
A FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe limit at which an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits of exposure are based on research which show that the energy of RF could cause harm to health.
what is a safe distance from a cell tower of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy absorbed by tissue. It's usually 1.6 watts per kilogram, calculated over one Gram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies, it has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other directly-exposed body areas. This can lead to a wide range of possible harms, such as an increase in the development of skin conditions like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the potential for harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to create a general power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 averaged across 1 centimeter, and never to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the peak SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever used a mobile phone, you're probably aware that a safe range from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is due to the power of transmission from the cell tower is significantly increased the further you are from it.
While this sounds like something that's good, the reality is that people living in close proximity to towers could be more susceptible to health issues. For what is a safe distance from a cell tower , a study conducted in 2014 in India found that residents who lived within 50 meters from cell towers suffered significant more health issues than those who were away from the antennas.
But, the study found that people who moved to areas that were further from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Another study has demonstrated that exposure to extreme frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to cancer, brain tumors and other health issues.
This is because RF radiation, which is used in wireless communication can penetrate the human body's outer layer, called the skin. It is crucial to know because the skin acts as a barrier to protect against mechanical injury, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and entry of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the largest organ of the human body, and is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on many assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. They include the incorrect belief that exposures to RF radiation are safe due to the limited radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
The assumption also ignores the greater penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals and the consequences of short bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. These assumptions are not in line with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore they shouldn't be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.
Furthermore, the ICNIRP and FCC limit their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs that are based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR) that is not a reliable dosimetric instrument for determining the level of exposure to RF radiation. In particular it is inconclusive for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents , such like sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation and other environmental agents could result in antagonistic or synergistic impacts. This could result in the risk of having adverse health effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may raise the chance of skin cancer and exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.