What is the safest distance from your 5G cell Structure?
If you've ever walked through a town, you may have seen tiny mini 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They look like little boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.
They are replacing the larger built cell towers. While they're less noticeable, they still can cause problems for people.
A of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the maximum amount of time an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits of exposure are based on scientific data which show that the energy of RF could cause harm to health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy taken up by tissues. It's usually 1.6 watts per kilogram, spread over a Gram of tissue.
However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies, it has the potential to create more energy on the skin and other exposed body areas. safe distance to live from cell phone tower could lead to various potential harms, including exacerbated development of skin diseases like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the possible harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to set a general localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 averaged over 1 cm2, and not to exceed 30 minutes, for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the maximum SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
Have you ever used a mobile phone, then you've probably realized that the safest location from the tower is at least 400 meters. This is due to the power of transmission from cell towers increases drastically the further the tower is.
Although this may sound like an ideal idea, the reality is that those living close to towers might be more prone to health problems. For example, a study from 2014 in India found that those who lived within 50 meters of cell towers had significantly more health complaints than those living further away from the antennas.
But, the study showed that residents who moved into areas farther away from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Look at this website has shown that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancer and other health issues.
This is because the RF radiation used in wireless communication can penetrate the human body's exterior layer, called the skin. This is vital to be aware of because the skin acts as a protective barrier against injury to the body, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and the entry of harmful substances. Additionally, it is the biggest organ in the human body and is accountable for keeping the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific evidence. safe distance to live from cell phone tower includes the false belief that exposures to RF radiations are not harmful due to the limited absorption into body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
The assumption also ignores the greater penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals as well as the effects on the body of short bursts generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions are not in line with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore they shouldn't be considered for health protection exposure guidelines.
In addition there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC limit the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR), which can be described as not a sufficient dosimetric tool to determine the degree of radiation exposure. In particular, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents , such as sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation with other environmental agents could result in antagonistic or synergistic impacts. This can lead to an increased risk of adverse health adverse effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may raise the chance of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.