What is the safest distance from your 5G cell Structure?
If you've ever wandered through a town, you may have seen tiny cell towers for 5G placed on poles for street lighting. They appear like tiny boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.
They are replacing larger, purpose-built cell towers. Although they're not as visible, they still can cause problems for people.
It is the Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe distance that one can expose to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on research which show that the energy of RF could be harmful to human health.
safe distance from cell tower (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. https://telegra.ph/What-is-the-safest-distance-coming-from-a-5G-cell-System-04-29-3 's typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, spread over a kilogram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies, it has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other exposed body areas. This could result in a wide range of possible harms, like the appearance of skin conditions like dermatitis, cataracts and skin cancer.
Due to the possible severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 based on the average over 1 cm2, and never exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the maximum SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
If you've ever used a cell phone, you're probably aware that a safe range from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is due to the transmitting power of the cell tower is significantly increased the further you are from it.
While this sounds like a good idea, the reality is that those living close to towers could be more vulnerable to health problems. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that residents living within 50 meters of cell towers experienced much more health problems than those who lived farther far from antennas.
This study showed that residents who moved into areas farther away from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Studies have also demonstrated that exposure to extreme amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancers as well as other health issues.
This is because RF radiation, which is utilized in wireless communications, may penetrate the human body's outer layer, the skin. This is important to understand because the skin acts as a shield against mechanical injury, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as entry of toxic substances. safe distance from cell tower is also the most important organ in the human body and is accountable for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds depend on a variety of assumptions that are not supported by scientific evidence. They include the false belief that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal penetration into the body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
The assumption also ignores the greater penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals, as well as the effects of brief bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These theories are not compatible with current knowledge of the biological consequences of RF radiation. Therefore, they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.
In addition, the ICNIRP and FCC restrict their radiation limits for local peak SARs, based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR), which can be described as an inadequate dosimetric tool to determine the degree of radiation exposure. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. Interactions of RF radiations with different environmental agents may result in antagonistic or synergistic effects. This can lead to an increased risk of adverse health adverse effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can raise the chance of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.